Truckee & North Lake Tahoe's Independent Newspaper | Tahoe News | Tahoe Music | Tahoe Events

Big Jack Project Will Increase Fire Risk

Reads 1315 Comments 1 Printer-friendly versionprint Send by emailemail

By TRINKIE WATSON

A group of concerned citizens met on April 3 to discuss the Big Jack East Project, which is the United States Forest Service (USFS) timber sale that borders the neighborhoods of Ponderosa Palisades, Martiswoods Estates, Ponderosa Ranchos, Sierra Meadows, Schaffer’s Mill, Lahontan, and Martis Camp. At just under 2,100 acres, this is a large forest area that has huge potential fire impact for a wide-spread area. This includes the Sawtooth/06 road enjoyed by thousands of people who love to recreate in the area year-round — cross-country skiing (The Great Ski Race), hiking, walking the dog, and biking. The focus for all of us residents is fire safety, and the fire mitigation project currently proposed would actually increase the risk of fire and present a serious danger to many neighborhoods in Truckee.

The Forest Service’s initial proposal indicated a clearing of approximately 20 feet between trees, allowing for limited shrub growth. Nature has historically had its way of maintaining healthy forests with naturally started, low-level fires that kept trees from becoming crowded, leaving the strong pines and firs able to thrive. Since we have invaded the mountains, we’ve suppressed fires and allowed incredible density that is now problematic for our homes and towns. The 20-foot radius has proven to be effective in modifying wildfire behavior, as was evident on the Angora Fire, but this proposal actually seeks to create far larger open spaces than that. For those who have been in the subject area, you have seen the incredible amount of trees marked in blue for removal — showing the intent to create 75 to 100 feet of space between trees — a 400 to 500 percent increase. This will allow greater open space for shrub fuel to propagate in such quantity that will exacerbate any fire that starts in the area. The original Forest Service proposal has currently been distributed with ‘clarification’ of this increase in space. This is not a minor clarification; it represents a significant change which, by law, requires collaboration with the public. With more sunlight hitting the forest floor, manzanita and snowbrush will flourish and spread, increasing the intensity of a wildfire threatening our community.

The Forest Service bases this plan on a report designed for Sierra mixed-conifer forests. Big Jack East clearly states the project area is an eastside pine forest — a completely different ecosystem. There is no justification or analysis of applying research developed for a mixed conifer forest to the eastside pine forest in Big Jack East. The Truckee Community Wildfire Protection Plan and the Forest Service’s Land Management Plan obligate the Forest Service to bring interested parties together with a plethora of information about fire history, climate, fire suppression resources, attack times and accessibility, etc. to design effective treatment patterns and to collaborate on defense zone distances next to communities. Although there have been public meetings, the Forest Service has not met this obligation. The Forest Service has avoided a public field trip on this project for two years, despite numerous requests.

There are numerous ways to learn about this project and get your voice heard. Tour the site this Tuesday April 17 or Thursday April 19 at 5 p.m. with Kathy Murphy, who recently retired from the Forest Service after 38 years and see with your own eyes what the real issues are regarding the project. For further information, questions, or to schedule a site visit, please contact baciandi@gmail.com. Visit the Facebook page to stay up to date. Corrections can still be made to this project to protect the life and property of our local citizens, and the public comment period ends April 23, so send your letters to comments-pacificsouthwest-tahoe-truckee@fs.fed.us before then. It is important to act now, before the trees are cut.

~ Trinkie Watson, a San Francisco native and resident of the Lake Tahoe area since 1966, has served the real estate business as a Realtor® since the early ‘70s and loves the mountains. She has lived in Truckee for 27 years and is raising her eighth German Shepherd and first girl, Dancer.

 

 
By creating and using an account on Moonshine Ink, you are agreeing to our user terms and submissions policy. Read the complete terms and policy.

Reader comments so far...

Mouse | Truckee
In response: I would strongly suggest that anyone who has an interest in this project get the facts before jumping into the discussion. The project is clearly emotionally charged and after meeting with the Forestry folks, I am convinced that some of us didn't get the whole story. Anything that can be done to reduce the forest fuels should be welcomed. This project has been in discussion for well over a year. Why now is there resistance? The comment period end is upon us. Where was everyone? The Forestry Service has assured that the slash will be cleaned up as the law requires. The space between trees is critical to reduce the possibility for Crown Fires. Crown Fires are difficult if not impossible to fight. Reducing the brush, etc on the ground is critical. The Argument that the Sun reaching the ground due to the spacing of trees would melt the snow thus preventing cross country skiing, snowmobiling and snowshoeing sounds pretty selfish to me. I am not sure where the writer got all the information but much it sounds to me like it might be hearsay. Beware...Go dig out the facts for yourself.

Don't Miss the Next Edition

Edition First-Round Deadline Drop-Dead Deadline
July 12 to Aug. 8 June 22 June 29
Aug. 9 to Sept. 12 July 20 July 27

About Opinion

The Opinion Page is your place to spout off. This section contains letters to the editor and longer My Shot pieces. Also, the Spout features two bimonthly perspectives — In the Past, delving into Tahoe Truckee history, and In the Moment, an artistic musing of a moment today.

Subscribe to the feed

Latest Tweets @moonshineink

  • The Grocery Outlet development in Truckee awaits approval tonight, as the planning commission votes on whether or n… https://t.co/tu2vn2FHQV 3 months 3 weeks ago
  • Concerned about growth in Truckee? Tune in to discussion on the Town's updates to its 2040 General Plan at 6 p.m. h… https://t.co/Oh65QkwEKh 4 months 4 days ago
  • Local developer overlooked twice on the Kings Beach Center development claims lack of county transparency. Placer… https://t.co/rWsVXHuNi9 4 months 1 week ago

Look for the latest Moonshine Ink issue on newsstands now.

Look for the latest issue in newsstands now.

Or subscribe and enjoy it hot off the press in your mailbox.

 
June 14, 2018