Truckee & North Lake Tahoe's Independent Newspaper | Tahoe News | Tahoe Music | Tahoe Events

Squaw Alpine Gondola Project, a Showcase of Damaging Impacts

Reads 1505 Comments 2 Printer-friendly versionprint Send by emailemail

By ELISE DUNCAN

The proposed Squaw Alpine gondola project is now out for public review and its environmental impact statement outlines many significant effects. We, the public, must oppose this plan — to protect our wilderness, heritage, and natural resources the future generations deserve to experience.

The gondola has been sold to us by Squaw/KSL as not only environmentally friendly, but even environmentally beneficial (reduced traffic, less pollution). But the U.S. Forest Service is pointing out 33 adverse impacts that would be caused by the project. KSL’s preferred alternative has been found to be the most environmentally damaging. Our wonderful Granite Chief Wilderness would be forever diminished, endangered species would lose habitat, and the 37 metal gondola towers would forever impact the views and the very popular Five Lakes Trail. The Caldwell land the gondola would cross has been marred for 15 years by the numerous metal chairlift towers, unused for all these years.

The damages this gondola would inflict on our public lands is too much. The project would cause more development at the base of our Granite Chief Wilderness, with 36 houses, horse stables, tennis courts, and another private chairlift. Moreover, there are related fire and emergency evacuation threats.

Squaw/KSL insisted since day one that the gondola would reduce traffic between Squaw Valley and Alpine Meadows, and that it would reduce the carbon footprint of the ski resorts (thus benefiting our future climate). It turns out the project will exacerbate our existing horrible traffic problems and increase the carbon emissions that harm our climate and future snowpack, according to the environmental impact report. Though Sierra Watch and the Granite Chief Wilderness Protection League have been challenging those KSL claims from the get-go, now the federal government is setting the developers straight.

I don’t understand how a gondola would operate in a predicted future that will have more frequent “shut down weather” and less (or zero) snow. Given the storms that hit upper Alpine this year, one has to wonder just how often that gondola would be able to run? I also struggle to see how they could operate the gondola “only in the winter,” as KSL has insisted for 18 months, given the likelihood of increasingly limited winter operations. Why care about summer gondola operations? It would bring masses of people, with coffee cups and heavy feet, into the Five Lakes Basin. The personal effort (the hike in) to Five Lakes is the best means we have to control the human impact on this sensitive area.

I was skiing at Squaw Valley in the early ’50s. My family has had a cabin at Alpine for five decades. We have never believed in that “vision” of connecting Alpine and Squaw. They are two very different experiences. Our family always believed in a bigger vision around the wilderness and Five Lakes, an area protected for its peace and unfettered beauty, rich with inspiration — a legacy for future generations.

Please go to the USFS website to learn more.

~ Elise Duncan of Mill Valley has been an Alpine Meadows cabin owner for over 50 years.

 
By creating and using an account on Moonshine Ink, you are agreeing to our user terms and submissions policy. Read the complete terms and policy.

Reader comments so far...

truckeefrank | truckee
I'm not actually a fan of KSL, but it would appear that the author deserves a charter membership in the NIMBY club. She wants to keep other peoples private land empty so she can enjoy hers without further expense. I have hiked all of the area in question, and the gondola would have very little visual impact. On the other hand, it would create an amazing variety of skiing experiences.

EKIHD | Here and now
Spot on commentary to yet another wirthless ego driven concept to unrepairably damage a pristine area. Thank you for writing this important commentary. This proposal is just another typical. example of egotistical people who come to this area for a very short time and think the mark they will leave will be for the better, when in fact itvis not. Something as absurd as thus gondola proposal is just another far fetched, unnecessary proposal to build something for the sake of media promotion, to try and increase visitor numbers, no more no less and by the way, it will not access any new skier terrain and create a visual blight in a picturesque wilderness area. Can you say indoor water park too? Good riddance Andy Wirth your time here has been nothing but shameful, from drunken fights at River Ranch to cheating on your wife. As the sticker says "Beat it Kook"

Don't Miss the Next Edition

Edition First-Round Deadline Drop-Dead Deadline
June 14 to July 11 May 25 June 1
July 12 to Aug. 8 June 22 June 29

About Opinion

The Opinion Page is your place to spout off. This section contains letters to the editor and longer My Shot pieces. Also, the Spout features two bimonthly perspectives — In the Past, delving into Tahoe Truckee history, and In the Moment, an artistic musing of a moment today.

Subscribe to the feed

Latest Tweets @moonshineink

  • The Grocery Outlet development in Truckee awaits approval tonight, as the planning commission votes on whether or n… https://t.co/tu2vn2FHQV 3 months 6 days ago
  • Concerned about growth in Truckee? Tune in to discussion on the Town's updates to its 2040 General Plan at 6 p.m. h… https://t.co/Oh65QkwEKh 3 months 1 week ago
  • Local developer overlooked twice on the Kings Beach Center development claims lack of county transparency. Placer… https://t.co/rWsVXHuNi9 3 months 3 weeks ago

Look for the latest Moonshine Ink issue on newsstands now.

Look for the latest issue in newsstands now.

Or subscribe and enjoy it hot off the press in your mailbox.

 
May 10, 2018