Manitoba, Alaska

Mountain Riders Alliance is working to convert an old ski area on Alaska's Kenai Peninsula into its first project. Courtesy photo

Skiers and Earth First

Mountain Riders Alliance Creates New Model for Ski Industry

By Melissa Siig/Moonshine Ink
* Web Exclusive *
Published: January 24, 2012

Sure, it’s snowing now and thoughts of Tahoe’s driest start to winter in more than a century may be a distant memory after your powder session this week, but Jamie Schectman hasn’t forgotten. Schectman, a Squaw Valley skier since 1987, bemoans the amount of energy ski resorts spent on snowmaking this season and wishes they would invest more in alternative energy.

“The energy burden of snowmaking is huge,” said Schectman, noting that he heard at the National Ski Area Association meeting last week in Squaw that electricity makes up 75 percent of a ski area’s emissions. “The idea of building bigger is all great and fine when you are booked during Christmas, but the reality is that weather fluctuates. That’s why ski areas need to invest in sustainable energy like on-site energy creation, than seasons like this won’t hurt you as hard.”

But Schectman isn’t waiting for ski resorts to take the green initiative. He’s doing it himself. In 2010, Schectman founded Mountain Riders Alliance, an organization whose mission is to create sustainable, skier-owned mountain playgrounds. The alliance plans on doing this by buying existing ski areas and converting them to its business model — create more energy on site than the ski area consumes, be owned and overseen by skiers, and be focused on the triple bottom line (planet, people, and profits).

“Richard Branson is one of my heroes,” said Schectman of the Virgin Group founder. “He believes doing good is good for business. This shortsightedness and [focus on] profit margins is decaying our community.”

Mountain Riders Alliance mountains would change the current ski resort model by taking the priority off of selling lift tickets and passes by selling memberships in each ski area it owns. Schectman calls this model a “poor man’s Yellowstone Club,” referring to the private ski community in Montana. The more shares members buy, the more benefits they receive, such as discounts on lift tickets, retail, and parties. Non-members would be allowed to ski on non-peak days. Each ski resort would be run by a membership advisory board (a la Squaw Passholders United, which Schectman also helped start but is no longer affiliated with - see "Powder to the People"), which will oversee management.

“That way, each ski area membership has a voice,” Schectman said.

Mountain Riders Alliance’s first experiment is at Manitoba Mountain in Alaska. The group will submit a formal application to purchase the ski area, which has been out of service since 1960, this spring. Phase one includes a Nordic center, while the second phase proposes three surface lifts, which would access 10,000 acres of Chugach terrain normally only reachable by helicopter. The Manitoba resort will be self-powered through micro-hydro energy.

“Manitoba is an industry game-changer,” Schectman said.

The second project in the works is in New England. That ski area, which is putting in an acre of solar panels, will be a net-negative energy producer. Even though Schectman laments the development and corporatization of local ski resorts, he said Tahoe isn’t a lost cause, yet.

“Mt. Rose, Sugar Bowl, and Kirkwood are the only three not past the tipping point,” Schectman said. “Kirkwood is an example of a ski resort that is underperforming with lots of potential, and with our model we could help it reach its potential.” For more information about Mountain Riders Alliance, visit mountainridersalliance.com.

5 Reader Comments so far ...

 
1. MRA
Memberships? Really? Where is the MRA product? Earth - friendly skis for $800 bucks? Stickers? T-shirts? Jamie,you are really loosing credibility and starting to sound more and more like the Boy who cried wolf to further his own personal agenda.
posted by: John Simon on Jan 25, 2012 at 10:02 AM
2. MRA Vision is correct
Pertaining to sustainability and energy creation on site.

No other ski area model existing or otherwise has even touched this important issue.

Long term sustainability is something that all of us 'roots' skiers should get behind and support. This is an opportunity to be part of something very special, very grass roots, something we may never see the likes of again.

MRA is a viable alternative to the 'Big Box' ski resort model. MRA's model is an excellent alternative to overpriced, overcrowded, luxury resort riding in today's world for the rest of us 99%ers.

This model is not a leveraged buyout deal by an equity firm whose sole purpose is profits and returns to investors. The 'big box' model stipulates termination of long term, hard working locals, slaps some lipstick on the pig, overdevelops real estate, harms the environment, depletes valuable resources, increases carbon footprints and energy consumption, and turns over ownership in 5-7 years.

Not a long term sustainable model for local economies. Money gets stripped from the locals and sent elsewhere to investors and owners looking for another area to infiltrate and harm.

This is not a well financed, slick marketing campaign akin to a political campaign, which makes local county permitting agencies and tax assessors blind to the unforeseen degradation of the local economy and environment whilst giddy from the anticipation of increased fees and taxes to be levied.

MRA is well conceived, is proving the ability to shift paradigms and conventional wisdom. It's mission is producing long term economic stability, reducing carbon footprints and energy consumption and creating renewable energy for many benefits to local economies.

Good work MRA

Great article Melissa
posted by: EKIHD on Jan 25, 2012 at 7:56 PM
3. What is the product
Where is the Product? How is this helping the local Tahoe community in the long run? Is MRA looking at a project in the Basin? Hydro-electric....great, lets see hows its actually going to power some lifts, let alone sell energy back to the grid. Manitoba is in Alaska right? How much fossil fuels are those planes going to use to fly their Members up to Manitoba?
posted by: Bok Choy on Jan 28, 2012 at 11:31 AM
4. Nay sayers will always exist when confronted with new concepts
Bok Choy, you do realize MRA is still in the discovery/development phase? As anything of this magnitude it takes vision and perseverance. It is not as simple as the new app for your Iphone. The benefits to the local economy can be justified in LONG TERM sustainability, long term employment and renewable energy in the form of solar and wind power as well. In case you haven't noticed, the sun shines in the Tahoe region over 300 days a year and wind blows at the mountain tops almost every day. Why doesn't the 'Big Box' resort model even entertain this idea? I don't know. Maybe you could enlighten us. As far as airline flights to Manitoba, those flights already exist thus MRA would not be adding any additional increase in carbon there. I think your logic and 'need it now' mentality is what is basically flawed.
posted by: EKIHD on Jan 29, 2012 at 11:56 AM
5. Say the Nay
I'm not a naysayer, I just want to see some examples of how Manitoba and MRA is going to do these things. What specific benefits will the local economy see in the long term? What jobs exactly will be added due to wind and solar? What about micro-hydro? What will they pay? Are they year round? What about the off season? What about insurance and benefits? Selling energy back to the grid? Fantastic idea, but how is that going to create a long term, sustainable community in Manitoba? Do we really need a phat ski strap for $10 bucks? Don't most LOCAL shops just pretty much give them away anyway...like Start Haus and Porters???
posted by: bok choy on Jan 30, 2012 at 10:22 AM
Post Your Commment
  • ★ required
  • ★ required but not displayed
  • ★ Naughty words and HTML are not allowed