view

 Royal Gorge trails offer breathtaking views.

Royal Gorge

Can they make ends meet?

By Tim Hauserman
December Print Edition
Published: December 13, 2008

     Royal Gorge Cross Country Ski Area announced in a letter to season pass holders this fall that they will be cutting back on days of operation and grooming schedules this winter. In an effort to cut costs and “break even” the nation’s largest cross-country ski resort is planning on being closed on Tues. and Wed. (except holiday periods) and rotate which areas they will groom throughout the rest of the week.

     The recent changes bring up an interesting question: What are the challenges of making ends meet at a cross-country ski center? And what are the special issues for Royal Gorge?

     Royal Gorge has a lot going for it. An extensive and incredibly beautiful network of trails: You can ski for three days and never ski the same trail twice, all while enjoying tremendous terrain and jaw-dropping views. Located on Donner Summit, an area that sees more snow than almost anywhere else in North America, Royal Gorge (almost) never has to worry about getting enough snow. The new owners of Royal Gorge, as of 2005, also bought the Ice Lakes Lodge, where a skier can spend the night, enjoy fine dining and then walk across the street to a trailhead. Also, Royal Gorge is the closest cross-country ski area to the foothills and the Bay Area.

     Royal Gorge also has some major challenges. While it is beneficial to get all the snow that Donner Summit receives, it also leads to much higher expenses for grooming and to skiers avoiding the area when the big blizzards arrive, making I-80 nearly impassable. Donner Summit also has a small year-round population base, making it more difficult to sell season passes or find local employees. Truckee may be only 10 miles away, but the close proximity of Tahoe Donner Cross Country and the challenge of I-80 during storms, make Royal Gorge a less attractive season pass choice for Truckee residents. And it certainly didn’t help the financial picture when the Wilderness Lodge burned down in 2003. Located in the center of the trail system, this large rustic lodge was a true delight, and provided a steady stream of skiers to the resort.

     The Economics
     Cross-country ski areas are considerably less expensive to run than a downhill resort, but the number of skiers, season pass holders and ticket prices are also considerably lower. The biggest expense for most cross-country ski areas is grooming, which includes fuel, grooming machines and the skilled operators who run those machines. A new grooming machine can cost $200,000 and they eat up a lot of fuel.

     The next highest expense is non-grooming related labor expenses, including instructors, ticker sellers and rental shop personnel (which at some areas may be all the same person). Nordic centers also have use fees or the cost of purchasing the land. Royal Gorge is primarily on private land, which was­­ recently purchased by the current owners at great expense.
Income at a cross-country center comes from season passes, ticket sales, equipment rentals, and a small percentage from food, waxing and merchandise sales.

     To understand the economic issues Royal Gorge Cross Country confronts, its instructive to look at nearby competitors. The two closest Nordic ski areas to Royal Gorge, Tahoe Donner Cross Country (TDCC) in Truckee and Tahoe Cross Country (TXC) in Tahoe City, are both run by nonprofit organizations. At Tahoe Donner, one of the largest residential developments in California, the homeowners association owns the land and oversees the ski area. Tahoe Cross Country is on public lands, and run by a ski education association.

     Both TDCC and TXC obtain a major percentage of their income from local skiers. Kevin Murnane, Manager of Tahoe Cross Country, estimates that in an average year 40 to 50 percent of income comes from trail passes and rentals, while 30 to 40 percent comes from the more than 600 season passes they sell. “We look at season pass holders as paying for the grooming, and so we groom for them: every day and as many trails as possible,” Murnane said.

     Royal Gorge, on the other hand, gets “considerably more income from day passes than season passes,” according to Mike Livak, the resort’s project manager.

     For both Tahoe Cross Country and TDCC, close connections to the local community are key. Tahoe Cross Country has an inexpensive after-school kids program called Strider Gliders, which brings more than 150 elementary school kids onto the trails one day a week. The goal is to get kids interested in cross-country skiing, and the community has responded positively. TDCC has a similar focus, with a major portion of their income coming from season pass sales purchased by Truckee and Tahoe Donner residents.

     New Royal Gorge manager Dave Achey is excited by the future. “What separates us from everyone else is the beauty of the land. We have Point Moriah. You can stay at Ice Lakes Lodge and skate to Sugar Bowl to have lunch. We have hut-to-hut skiing.” What they don’t have, however, is a lot of skiers mid-week. By cutting out Tuesdays and Wednesdays, the resort believes they are only losing 20 to 30 skiers per day and eliminating major labor expenses. Achey asserts that not only will eliminating two days a week lower labor costs, but it will also make it easier to find employees. Now the resort can hire people to work a five-day week, while if they were open seven days a week they would need to find lots of part-time workers, a challenge on Donner Summit. With grooming being the biggest expense, cutting back on grooming is a major cost savings. The resort plans on rotating grooming so that not every trail will be groomed every day. While this will reduce costs, it remains to be seen if less trails being groomed will lead to decreased ticket and season pass sales.

     On the income side, Royal Gorge is looking into ways to increase season ticket sales, especially on the western slope areas such as Nevada City and Auburn. “We are looking into the downhill skier market,” Achey says. The last few years more downhill skiers have found that cross-country skiing complements their downhill skiing.

     “Everywhere I turn I see opportunities,” Achey says.  “We are really trying to launch better skier relations. I want to see this place be successful.”

     So what do other people in the cross-country world think about Royal Gorge’s plans? In several conversations I had, people understood the economic realities that Royal Gorge faces, but there was some fear that these changes were the beginning of the end for the resort. Most people had a suggestion or two for the resort. One suggestion was to cut back on the total kilometers of trails at the resort, but groom those trails regularly, so skiers would know they were getting a top-notch product. Others suggested lowering the day pass rate, which is higher than other Nordic centers in the area. Another suggestion was to provide a special reduced rate ticket to those with season passes to another resort. These active skiers would love to ski Royal Gorge, but the Gorge’s $29 ticket price feels pretty steep when you’ve paid for a season pass elsewhere. Another key to the future success of Royal Gorge, cited by several experts, was getting the Wilderness Lodge rebuilt and operational.

     Dan Wexler from the Donner Summit Area Association (DSAA) suggested “appealing more to recreational cross-country skiers rather than expert types.” Recreational skiers are a large market and include many people who have never skied on groomed trails before. Achey from Royal Gorge agrees, saying that attracting more recreational skiers will be an important part of their marketing efforts. DSAA also offered “to help provide ideas, insights and experience to help improve the popularity and overall experience at Royal Gorge.”

     Another possibility for Royal Gorge is to allow dogs on the trails. Tahoe Cross-Country has found that allowing dogs on 8 kilometers of trail has been very popular and helps sell both season passes and day passes. (And dogs have to buy tickets as well!)

     Royal Gorge also might pick up some lessons from Spooner Lake Cross Country. While a much smaller operation than Royal Gorge, Spooner confronts some of the same issues. Located on the Nevada side of the lake on Spooner Summit where Highway 28 and Highway 50 meet, it’s a beautiful spot for skiing, but is located away from major population centers. Spooner has built several log cabins on the trail that they rent out to skiers in the winter, and bike riders in the summer. They purchased a grooming snowmobile that they use in between storms to keep the trails fresh at a fraction of the cost of running the big cat. And they run a bike rental and Flume Trail shuttle operation during the summer months to help make ends meet.
Will Royal Gorge take tips from other resorts and/or develop other changes to stop the red ink? The answers are yet to be seen. Stay turned.  

     Royal Gorge is open once the snow flies from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Thursday to Monday, and seven days a week during holiday periods. Tickets are $29 on weekends and holidays, $25 mid-week. 530-426-3871, royalgorge.com.

     ~ Tim Hauserman wrote “Cross-Country Skiing in the Sierra Nevada.” He teaches at Tahoe Cross-Country Ski Area.

5 Reader Comments so far ...

 
1. Great article.
I do believe a first class XC resort such as Royal Gorge has a great potential. But, up to now, it has been marketed very poorly.

Yes, the resort face a number of challenges, including:
1- Very poor relationship with the local community.
2- The extravagant price paid by the current owner, Royal Gorge LLC., for the resort in 2005. As per public records, $21,000,000 for the business and about $13,000,000 for the land. The land price does not include Rainbow Lodge nor Ice Lakes Lodge.

The buyer, RG LLC. bought the XC resort not to run it, but to replace it with a large development (750+ condominium units and 250+ residential units - more than twice as many as in Sugar Bowl, Northstar and Squaw combined), a downhill ski resort East of Ice Lakes, and two artificial lakes.

The local community felt insulted by the very deceptive marketing campain run by RG LLC. to sell their proposal, hence the very poor relationship with local residents, which culminated with the defeat of the incumbent pro-RG LLC. County Supervisor by a local Summit resident, Jennifer Montgomery.

But worth, due to the lack of water and sewage capacity on the Summit (and many other issues that RG LLC. could have found out in 2005 before purchasing the resort, had they done any due diligence), the proposed development is essentially dead, and RG LLC. is looking for a way to be bailed out.

Until the owners take a big hair cut (write down), there is no way that the resort can be made profitable. It's a high-stakes business when you speculate on real estate to the tune of tens of millions of dollars and a big loss is the down side risk that comes with the territory. The current global financial storm certainly does not help!
posted by: Bernard Pech on Jan 1, 2009 at 3:08 PM
2. Blame Bad Management/Ownership
This article illustrates the continued BS coming out of RG (quotes and obvious sources). The new owners and their latest GM are totally inept. The grooming has been bad, especially right after Christmas. That led to skiers actually going up the office and screaming at the staff.

In non-storm periods, XC trails are groomed at night or early morning so that the snow has a chance to "set". RG was sending out groomers at 9AM (as skiers showed up to ski), when the trails should have been already groomed. The grooming was the worst ever in the history of RG for days. Now they are grooming just a limited number of trails, others left rutted for days. Clueless.

During the recent holiday period, at times RG also had no instructors available to give lessons when people had already paid for the lessons, at the same time the instructors were sitting in their little hut gabbing away. Just plain bad management.

BTW, most of their staff are foreign students that work at minimum wage; few of these are actual skiers (but all are extremely nice people!). To get actual skiers doing instruction, the staff is supplemented with "old timers" that teach in exchange for a "free pass", ski gear at below wholesale, and minimum wage pay. There has never been a lack of staff in past years, and again, staff is almost always super nice. It ain't the staff's fault, OK?

The article is wrong, RG does NOT have an extensive network of trails - not anymore. They are NOT "North America's Largest Ski Resort", unless one counts the view of acres of US Forest Service land. The actual number of trails now being groomed is close to maybe 50, and 40% of those are NOT groomed on a daily basis - even when they are charging $29 for a day pass. The public is flat out being lied to.

Many season pass holders went elsewhere this year (mostly Tahoe Donner, where the lot has been overflowing). RG's lot has been partially full (at best), but that is because their blower broke down and the lot is much smaller in size than in the past. Plus it is an ice nightmare, even at the entrance which could be cleared with their working grader any afternoon; again, bad management.

The grooming did improve a bit after all the complaints, mainly because the snow is now settled and easy to groom. Once we get another storm, it will most likely go back to being the pits - literally with pits and ruts and bad grooves.

Yes, the skiers (of all abilities) expect good grooming. They PAY for it to be nice! If RG is going to charge $29 weekend/holidays and $25 weekdays, and also say that they will groom everything they did last year (only about 65 km total), then one cannot fault the skiers from expecting RG to do so - and in going elsewhere when RG does not. Surely the number of season pass holders will drop even more next year, if there is a next year.

This is a downward spiral. Cheapening out on grooming will lead to less skiers and income, and then the new owners will "need" to save more money and groom even less and faster/worse, and then more skiers will go elsewhere, etc.

Do the new owners care? Most long time skiers think not - that they bought the resort to make money on getting a huge housing development approved, and then they'd sell that off (to another development company to do the actual building) and move to their ranch in Costa Rica. They are not XC skiers, they have no ties to or interest in Donner Summit or a well run XC ski area. They are only interested in making "flip it" development money. Period. Actually run a business? Huh!

Most people think this is the last year. It's too bad. Bye bye RG.

posted by: Baldhead Willy on Jan 1, 2009 at 9:32 PM
3. Trying hard...
Royal Gorge ownership DOES ski. I see them there on a regular basis and they simply love the land the resort is occupying.

The best thing we can all do to help RG is to show up and ski. Tell your friends. Bring your classmates.

The current management is very willing to listen to any of your concerns - so make a point of making them known when you stop off for a ski.
posted by: David Galson on Feb 3, 2009 at 5:18 PM
4. Plans to build 900+ units is not a whole lotta love
Since Royal Gorge LLC is encountering so many infrastructure problems, including, but not limited to lack of water, less than optimal sewage disposal options, inability to identify the second egress Placer County requires, why don't they think outside the "developers' box"? Perhaps they should think seriously about reducing the scope of their plans, and working with one of the well established local land trusts to preserve the cross country skiing and wilderness experience at Donner Summit. That would be a win-win for everyone--and realistically, if they build all those units, will anyone show up to ski? How many cross country skiers are going to want to fork out money to "cross-condo" ski?
posted by: Kate Gray on Feb 7, 2009 at 12:56 PM
5. Responsibility to Future Generations
To the current owners: at one point it must have seemed like that right thing to buy this property and build condos, but at this point if I were you I would take care of this resort the best you can and restore it to functioning like it did in the past. I am trying to convince my baby-boomer friends that Nordic skiing, once you get into it, is more exciting and interesting than Alpine (and I do both). Sitting on lifts is boring - with XC you are in constant motion. Your adrenaline is up and so are your endorphins. I am going to have a hard time convincing my friends to go if I can't take them to Devil's peak. Some day in the future, do you want to be remembered as those who ruined Royal Gorge, or those who kept it the best and biggest place for XC in North America?
posted by: Marko Bodor on Feb 20, 2009 at 5:04 PM
Post Your Commment
  • ★ required
  • ★ required but not displayed
  • ★ Naughty words and HTML are not allowed